But how do you feel about your own performance?
March 10th, 2010
Something that has been bouncing around my head since an interview during the Olympics by Matt Lauer with Bode Miller. (I think this is the interview, but since I’m in Germany now, I can’t verify.) Matt asked Bode about a comment that he made regarding the gold not mattering to him. Matt was pushing about whether this was true, and from what I remember if it was disrespectful to the gold or not. Bode made a great point, and I relate to what he said. He does not judge himself by whether he wins the gold or not, it is how he performs compared to how he believes he should have performed.
It is easy to say that Bode is pretending to be above the medal. It isn’t that though. He values the gold, but he values his own judgement of his performance more. No one knows better than you how you could have performed. You know the conditions of the hill, better than you think, even. Yes, there are things out of your control, but that’s part of the sport. It is how you handle yourself on the hill. Did you respond the way you could, or did you hit snooze? This is exactly what Bode meant. Only he knows when he’s performed to his potential … 1 gold, 8 golds, or none. Do you regularly think about how you performed by your own standards?
I do and I find it frustrating. Bode has me on his Zen approach to this. What I love about it is that I do think it holds me to a higher standard overall. I know better than anyone what I can accomplish. However, as Bode points out, winning or losing takes on a different scope. When there is a mismatch between your beliefs on performance and the world’s, it is unsatisfying. Either you feel not worthy of praise because you could have done better, or you feel cheated because you did your best, and it wasn’t recognized.
So, what is the take away? Judge yourself by your own standards, but make sure you hold those standards high. Benchmark yourself with others, still staying true to you.
And why do you want to do it? Because ultimately for you, you do know best. Trust yourself, and challenge yourself.
Be Bode!
So what’s on my shirt today? This is from the Adam Bryant’s interview of Wolters Kluwer CEO, Nancy McKinstry, in the Corner Office column of the New York Times.
Every day, advance the ball
11 Comments Add your own
1. Pascal | March 10th, 2010 at 10:45 am
Great piece Jana!
It’s an interesting way to frame this: For me the Bodes of this world were always those who are more interested in the work than the reward.
When you hire someone and you don’t have a lengthy discussion about her salary or bonus but find yourself answering lots of questions about the actual work - that’s the moment you’re hiring a Bode… Not too many around - but when you find them, they are the most fun, the most inspiring and the most awesome people you can hang out with (and as you are a Bode yourself - hanging out includes your work).
Now I’ve got a word for them - Bodes. :)
2. Jana Eggers | March 10th, 2010 at 12:14 pm
Pascal,
Thanks for adding the hiring aspect to this. I had not thought of it in that way. Now, I’m thinking of what questions you can ask to get at this. Right now, it is a few questions I’d add to my references checklist following some of the answers I got in the interview about best and worst projects.
Best,
Jana
3. Matt | March 10th, 2010 at 9:36 pm
Good article, great thought. I’m not sure to what or how much I agree with your conclusion, though… I can’t put my finger on why that is. I guess I think that it is important to do work (tasks, jobs, whatever) that is also important to others. When a “Bode” person has really high achievement goals or standards, that will work well within his or her field of endeavor. But “standards” exist for a reason - so that the work that is done can be determined to be valuable or not.
Dilbert’s Wally has a high achievement standard, but in a field that isn’t valuable to anyone except himself. He can even be admired for his achievements, but it doesn’t advance or help anyone else.
Your Bodes’ employees’ self-imposed standards still need to meet or exceed the “value” standard, or else they aren’t going to be a good addition to your team.
- Matt H
4. Jana Eggers | March 10th, 2010 at 10:40 pm
Matt, you have a great point. I should have clarified some of this to make that more clear. Bode still needs to legitimately complete the race. This means he has to ski downhill, stay within bounds, make the gates, etc. He’s not a rebel (in how he skis) or having skill that’s not useful. It is a question about judging the quality of what he does, rather than what is done. Sometimes you win the gold because things just went right with you and it doesn’t feel like a gold medal day based on your own performance. And sometimes you don’t win and it was the best performance of your life… your own internal gold.
Based on this, I think it is a good question to try to find out. Is the team member setting their own standards for their quality. Do they strive to be better even when they’ve been recognized as winning? Do they have the personal fortitude to know they’ve done good job, even when they’ve “lost”?
If someone doesn’t care about the gold because they aren’t playing the same game, then I completely agree, you don’t want them on your team. If they don’t care about the gold, because they are using more than one metric to judge themselves, then you probably want them more… than someone else with similar skills but missing this component.
Like I said, this idea has been bouncing around in my head since I heard it. I really resonated with what Bode said, and I don’t quite know how to place it. Yours and Pascal’s comments are helping me with that. So, again, thanks to you both!
Happy day!
Jana
5. Matt | March 11th, 2010 at 2:45 am
I think that’s a great synopsis: they need to be playing the same game, or a game you think it is worth playing :-). It’s about performance in the game, not about winning the game, but we’re all talking about skiing here.
- Matt
6. Markus Andrezak | March 13th, 2010 at 7:06 pm
Right,
and you sure know what’s worst and most of you have experienced it, I guess:
You really failed and you were really below your standards but guess what - all of a sudden your boss (or whoever) gives praise to you for that performance. Or the other way around. (You excelled and no one realizes, not even the effect, business value, you name it)
This is really where - whatever your self esteem - you ask yourself what’s going on. If that’s happening, nowadays I try to make a point of it to get the coordinate systems back in sync.
Cheers
Markus
7. Jana Eggers | March 13th, 2010 at 9:02 pm
Markus, it is a great point to work to get the systems back in sync. Why are you off or why are they?
And sometimes it is just “the weather” and you should still feel great about your performance remembering its just one event.
Thanks!
8. Jonathan | March 22nd, 2010 at 9:46 pm
Great post Jana. To me, Bode’s comment was more a metaphor on life. It’s about the journey we take vs. the actual end goal. Of course, it is important to set goals for oneself (i.e. gold medal performance, successful career, great relationships, etc…) but once the intention is made or the goal is set, it is equally important to remain dispassionate about the outcome, no? That way, the journey towards the goal becomes much more enjoyable and memorable than the goal itself :)
9. Tucker Balch | May 29th, 2010 at 2:29 am
Jana,
Your ego is extremely impressive!
Tucker
10. Elinfomatico | June 27th, 2010 at 3:32 pm
Hello, I have a problem with the company www.spreadshirt.es.
You have taken more money than was agreed
Please, I’m Spanish, Contact me because I want a solution.
Info@elinformatico.eu
11. Jana Eggers | June 27th, 2010 at 7:09 pm
Elinfomatico,
I have responded to your question via email, including our service team. I have checked for your orders, and there were 2, with one that was cancelled. The cancelled one was a little less in price than the one that wasn’t cancelled. The service team will follow-up with you to understand the situation, and work on a resolution.
Thank you for contacting us,
Jana
Leave a Comment
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>
Trackback this post | Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed